0:04

They mention they're going out on Saturday, and you're three sentences into the argument before they're finished telling you. Not out loud, in your head, and what you notice while it's happening is the speed of it. There used to be a gap between hearing something and reacting to it, and you used to be able to do something with that gap. Now, the reaction is already there, fully formed, and it's recognizably the same reaction you've always had, arriving faster and at about twice the volume. Then it takes the rest of the evening to come down, which it never used to. You're not doing anything wrong. Something may have changed, and it may not be your relationship, and it may not be you getting worse at this. If any of that sounds familiar, you're not broken, you're not too much. Your nervous system may be doing exactly what it learned to do long before this relationship began. I'm Dr Narelle Duncan, a Clinical Psychologist drawing on 30 years of helping people understand themselves. This is Steady and Connected. Each episode, I'll bring you the science, the tools, and the clarity to understand what may be happening when anxiety shows up in love, and what you might do with that understanding. Let's get Steady and Connected. Last time, we finished four episodes that looked across the table at the other person. Today, we come back to your side of it, and we look at a stretch of years rather than a conversation. What can change in mid-life, what tends not to change at all, why a louder reaction can feel like a truer one, and one question to ask when the volume surprises you. Let's start with what we're talking about, because two different things tend to get collapsed into one, and the collapse is where most of the difficulty sits. An anxious attachment pattern is a set of expectations your nervous system holds about closeness in relationships, along with an alarm that fires when those expectations look like they're about to be confirmed. That alarm has three settings worth separating out. It has a threshold, which is how much it takes to set it off. It has a volume, which is how hard it arrives, and it has a recovery time, which is how long it takes to come back down once nothing further has happened. The content of the alarm, the actual sentence it says to you, tends to be remarkably stable across a life. Most people can recognise a version of it from their 20s in a different relationship about a different person. What can move and what does seem to move for a lot of people somewhere between the early 40s and the mid-50s is the other three: a lower threshold, so less sets it off; a higher volume, so it arrives harder; a longer recovery, so an evening that used to reset in 20 minutes now takes until morning. One thing to name before we go any further, I'm not a medical doctor, and nothing in this episode is medical advice. The physical side of this stretch of life, the sleep, the body, what's worth investigating and what's worth treating is a conversation for your GP, and it's a good conversation to have. What I can talk about is what may happen to an attachment pattern, where the system it runs on is running differently, and what you might do with that. So here's what this can look like from the inside.

The shortened gap: 4:16

there used to be a moment between hearing something and reacting to it. Now the reaction can be there before you've decided to have it.

The longer tail: 4:26

it isn't that you get upset, it's that you're still down at ten o'clock over something that happened at six.

The old thought on a new night: 4:36

the three in the morning rehearsal turns up on nights that used to be fine, and the material it uses is the same material it has always used.

The voice you don't recognise as yours: 4:50

you hear yourself say something with an edge in it, and part of you thinks,"This isn't how I talk to them."

The conclusion about the relationship: 5:01

because the reactions are stronger, you start reading them as evidence that something between you has gone wrong.

The private verdict about yourself: 5:13

perhaps quieter than the others and usually some version of, "I'm becoming someone difficult to live with." If any of those landed, it's worth taking notice of and here's what they may have in common. Not one of them is likely a new pattern. Every one of them may be an old pattern at a different setting. Notice what lands and notice what doesn't Now, the mechanism, and it's about amplification rather than content. There are two separate things worth pulling apart. There's a signal, which is whatever your system has detected, the slow reply, the change of tone, the Saturday plan, and there's an amplifier, which is everything about your state that decides how loudly that signal arrives. The amplifier includes how much sleep you actually got, how much you've already carried that day, and how much reserve there is underneath all of it. An anxious pattern is, among other things, a system that tends to run with a fairly small reserve to begin with. It's doing more monitoring than a settled system does, and monitoring costs something. Now, take a stretch of years where sleep can become broken, where the body is managing a change it didn't schedule, and where the ordinary reserve can be lower for reasons that have nothing at all to do with your relationship. Turn the amplifier up on a system that was already close to its limits, and you don't get a new alarm. You can get the same alarm louder and for longer. Here's the part that matters most. A louder signal is not a more accurate one. The volume tells you about the amplifier. It doesn't tell you whether the thing you detected is real, and it doesn't tell you how serious it is. Those are separate questions, and at the end of a long day on four hours sleep, they can feel like one question. If you'd like to know which moments set your own alarm off most reliably, the free quiz at steadyandconnected.com.au is a good place to start. It's for self-reflection, not a clinical assessment, and your results come to your inbox with a short email series that goes deeper on what they mean for you. It's worth a moment on how this gets read, because the outside reading and the inside reading tend to be wrong in opposite directions. From the outside, there's a word that arrives, and most women in this decade have had it said about them at least once, hormonal, offered as an explanation and received as a dismissal, because what it can mean in practice is that the thing you raise doesn't have to be answered. That reading is misguided, and one of the things it does is make people stop raising anything at all. From the inside, the error runs the other way. The reaction is louder, so it can feel more true. Something that would've passed as a thought at 40 arrives at 48 with weight behind it, and weight is very hard to tell apart from significance. So a conclusion forms. This is worse than I thought, and the relationship must be in trouble. And underneath both of those sits a layer that can be hard to sit with, a sentence about yourself, usually arriving late in the evening, about the kind of person you're turning into. That one may be doing more work in your week than either of the other two, and it tends not to get said out loud to anyone. That sentence may be misguided as well. A change in volume is not necessarily a change in character, and a system running with less reserve is not a person becoming worse. So let's go back to Saturday and walk it through. They mention the plan. Your system detects the same thing it has always detected, which is an evening with your name nowhere in it. That's the signal, and it's a signal you've had at 30. Then the amplifier, a third night of broken sleep, a day already carrying more than it looks like it's carrying, and a reserve lower than the one you used to run on. So the reaction arrives with no gap in front of it at a volume that makes it feel like news. And then the tail.

It's still there at 9: 10:22

00 because coming down takes longer now, and the length of the tail becomes its own evidence. Surely something that lasts this long must be about something. None of that was you becoming difficult. What may have changed is the alarm, and it may not be your relationship. It could simply be how much the room amplifies it. So here's the one thing for this episode, and it's a question rather than an action. Next time a reaction arrives at a volume that surprises you, ask yourself one

thing: 11:03

Is this louder or is this new? Not is it real, not is it fair, just louder or new. If you recognise the reaction, if you could date a version of it to, say, a decade ago, the answer is it's louder. If it's genuinely something you've never felt about this person before, it's more likely new, and new is worth attending to. A lot of the time, the honest answer may be louder, and the sentence to hold onto is that louder is not necessarily truer. It's also not false. Something set it off. The volume just isn't the evidence for what it means. This is a gentle experiment with no right result, and some evenings you won't think to ask the question until afterwards, which still counts and on scope twice over. This isn't medical advice, and if the physical side of this stretch of life is making things harder, that's a conversation worth having with your GP rather than managing on your own. And if the answer keeps coming back new, if something in your relationship has genuinely changed, then the volume question doesn't cover it, and that's worth taking to someone who can sit with both of you. If you'd like somewhere to work this out on paper, I've made you a one-page guide called "Louder, Not Truer", the reaction as it arrived, an honest reading of the amplifier that day, and the one question. It's at go.steadyandconnected.com.au/louder-not-truer. Free and yours to keep. There's another version of this decade where nothing about you changes at all and the house does. A bedroom that stays tidy, a car that isn't in the driveway on an ordinary night, and a system that has spent years keeping track of several people at once with only one person left to point it at. That's where we're going next time. And one more thing before I go, understanding the pattern is where this starts. What tends to shift it is doing something with the understanding, not once, repeatedly, in the ordinary moments where it actually runs. That's what I built the workbooks for, three of them and a start here guide so what you learn here gets put into practice. They're at steadyandconnected.com.au That's everything for this episode. If today resonated, follow Steady and Connected wherever you listen, so the next episode lands automatically. And if someone came to mind while you were listening, share it with them. If you'd like to know which attachment pattern is most active for you, take the free five-minute quiz at steadyandconnected.com.au. Your results come straight to your inbox, along with a short email series that goes deeper on what they mean for you. If today's conversation has brought up anything you need support with, please reach out. Lifeline is available 24/7 on 13 11 14. And if you're ready to explore this work more personally, I offer individual telehealth sessions at getlifedirection.com. I'm Dr Narelle Duncan, Clinical Psychologist. Take good care of yourself, and I'll see you in the next episode.